Thursday, November 29, 2012

UPTET : टीईटी: आरोपपत्र पर बचाव पक्ष की बहस पूरी


UPTET : टीईटी: आरोपपत्र पर बचाव पक्ष की बहस पूरी



कानपुर : पूरे घटनाक्रम की जांच नियम विरुद्ध की गई है। ऐसे में जब नियमों की अनदेखी कर तैयार किया गया आरोप पत्र पूरी तरह सवालों के घेरे में है। टीईटी मामले में गुरुवार को बचाव पक्ष के अधिवक्ता ने नरेंद्र प्रताप सिंह व मनीष चंद्र के पक्ष में देहात जिला जज धर्मवीर सिंह की अदालत में यह दलील दी।

बचाव पक्ष के अधिवक्ता सुरेंद्र प्रताप सिंह ने कहा कि विवेचना त्रुटिपूर्ण है। मामले पर कोई भी शिकायत कर्ता नहीं है पुलिस खुद ही शिकायत कर्ता की भूमिका में है। विवेचक ने कोई भी साक्ष्य खुद इकट्ठा नहीं किए बल्कि इंस्पेक्टर द्वारा किए गए हैं। उनके मुवक्किल सरकारी कर्मचारी हैं लेकिन उनके खिलाफ मुकदमा चलाने की अनुमति नहीं ली गई। इन सब दलीलों के आधार पर उन्होंने कहा कि पुलिस द्वारा लगाए गए आरोप उनके मुवक्किलों पर नहीं बनते। इस मामले में अदालत ने अभियोजन को अपना पक्ष रखने के लिए 7 दिसंबर की तारीख दी है। बताते चलें कि टीईटी धन बरामदगी मामले में माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद के पूर्व निदेशक संजय मोहन समेत सभी आरोपियों को कड़ी सुरक्षा में अदालत में पेश किया गया। सुनवाई के बाद सभी को जेल भेज दिया गया


Source : http://www.jagran.com/uttar-pradesh/kanpur-city-9894302.html / Jagran (29.11.12)
*****************
Sanjay Mohan's case still running in court and no final decision arrives.

UPTET / Allahabad Highcourt : Recruitment on competencies ground for the post of Asst. Teacher -TET Qualification is MUST


UPTET / Allahabad Highcourt : Recruitment on competencies ground for the post of Asst. Teacher -TET Qualification is MUST



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH

?Court No. - 6

Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 4629 of 2012

Petitioner :- Brij Kishore Srivastava
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Secy. Basic Edu. Deptt. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Jitendra Bahadur Singh,Brij Raj Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar

Hon'ble Shabihul Hasnain,J.
Heard Sri Jitendra Bahadur Singh learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ajai Kumar for the opposite party no. 3 and the learned Standing Counsel.
The petitioner's father died on 25.7.2010. He was a regular employee. The petitioner being his son applied for compassionate appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher. The case has been rejected on the ground that Assistant Teacher can only be appointed after eligibility test. It is the recent requirement of the Government Order.
The petitioner says that his case may be considered for any other appropriate post which may be available to mitigate the hardship which has been caused because of death of his father.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioner for any other suitable post according to his qualification, say within a maximum period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before them.
This order shall be subject to the outcome of the decision of Special Appeal pending at Allahabad.
Order Date :- 1.11.2012/Om.


Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2179988

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

RTE in UP : 'UP schools openly flouting RTE norms'


RTE in UP : 'UP schools openly flouting RTE norms'


LUCKNOW: Expressing concern over non-implementation of mandatory provision of 25% reservation for disadvantaged children under the Right to Education Act (RTE), a representative body working for this Act met Governor BL Joshi on Monday. The delegation was led by former MP and social activist Subhashini Ali.

The representatives submitted a memorandum on disadvantaged children being unable to exercise the right of free education in private, aided and unaided minority schools as stated under the Right to Free and Compulsory Education. This provision is to be applicable from academic session 2013-14.


The members also apprised the governor that schools in the state are openly flouting the RTE norms despite the Supreme Court ruling that all private schools will have to reserve 25% seats for disadvantaged children. They also informed the governor that no official order in this regard has been circulated to the schools till now.

The members said governor assured them that he will take up the matter with the state government.



News Source : http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-11-20/lucknow/35226837_1_rte-norms-unaided-minority-schools-private-schools / Times of India (20.11.12)
******************************
According to news -

Disadvantage children having 25% kota/reservation under RTE, But is not effectively implemented.

You can see on this blog, there are many problems which create hindrance for not implementing RTE as per norms like facilities in schools, big shortage of teachers, delay in implementation etc.

UPTET : यूपी टीईटी के करोड़ों का नहीं मिल रहा हिसाब


UPTET : यूपी टीईटी के करोड़ों का नहीं मिल रहा हिसाब


अध्यापक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी)-2011 के पैसों का हिसाब नहीं मिल पा रहा है। बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग पिछले तीन महीनों से लगातार पत्राचार कर रहा है कि टीईटी फार्म भरने वालों से मिले पैसे का हिसाब कर दिया जाए। यह बताया जाए कि परीक्षा कराने पर कितने खर्च हुए और अभी कितना बचा हुआ है, लेकिन माध्यमिक शिक्षा विभाग है कि हिसाब देने को तैयार नहीं है।

कहा तो यह भी जा रहा है कि टीईटी के पैसों का पूरा हिसाब नहीं मिल रहा है। तत्कालीन माध्यमिक शिक्षा निदेशक जेल में हैं और उस समय की सचिव माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद प्रभा त्रिपाठी कुछ भी स्पष्ट नहीं बता पा रही हैं। इसके चलते माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग को बचे हुए पैसे का हिसाब नहीं दे पा रहा है।

यूपी में वर्ष 2011 में पहली बार टीईटी आयोजित कराई गई थी। बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग से आयोजित होने वाली परीक्षा  माध्यमिक शिक्षा विभाग को सौंप दी गई थी। उस समय टीईटी के लिए करीब 14 लाख अभ्यर्थियों ने आवेदन किए। सामान्य और पिछड़ा वर्ग के अभ्यर्थियों से 500 और अनुसूचित जाति व जनजाति से 250 रुपये परीक्षा शुल्क लिया गया

माध्यमिक शिक्षा विभाग को इससे करीब 16 करोड़ रुपए की आय हुई। जानकारों का कहना है कि परीक्षा कराने के लिए प्रत्येक मंडलों को 30 से 32 लाख रुपए दिए गए। इस हिसाब से इसके आयोजन पर करीब 5 करोड़ 75 लाख रुपए के आसपास खर्च हुआ। इसके अलावा परीक्षा का रिजल्ट तैयार करने वाली कंप्यूटर कंपनी को करीब 5 करोड़ रुपए दिए जाने की बात प्रकाश में आई है। इसके अलावा अन्य पैसे कहां गए इसका पता नहीं चल रहा है। इस संबंध में माध्यमिक शिक्षा विभाग के अधिकारी चुप्पी साधे हुए है

प्रमुख सचिव बेसिक शिक्षा सुनील कुमार ने माध्यमिक शिक्षा विभाग को सितंबर 2012 में पहला पत्र लिखा कि टीईटी के आयोजन की जिम्मेदारी परीक्षा नियामक प्राधिकारी को सौंप दी गई है। इसलिए टीईटी 2011 के आयोजन के बाद जो पैसा बचा है, उसे परीक्षा नियामक प्राधिकारी को सौंप दिया जाए। प्रमुख सचिव के इस पत्र के बाद भी टीईटी के पैसों का हिसाब नहीं दिया जा रहा है। बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग ने इस संबंध में पुन: माध्यमिक शिक्षा विभाग को पत्र लिखा है कि पैसा वापस कर दिया जाए


News Source : http://www.amarujala.com/news/samachar/national/financial-irregularity-may-be-in-up-tet/ / Amar Ujala ( 27.11.12)
*********************************
How candidates will get their extra money back, If similar problem arises for apply in 5 district / 5 DD and after court's instruction extra money will be back to candidates.

UPTET : From FB Wall - Struggle for Right to Education


UPTET : From FB Wall - Struggle for Right to Education 

Till 7th Adevertisement for Recruitment of primary teachers is Not Possible -

Neelesh Purohit >>>Struggle for Right to Education Implementation"एक पहल" >>
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=327778237329298&set=o.303122093128039&type=1&relevant_count=1&ref=nf
See News -



UPTET/Shiksha Mitra : From Facebook Wall


UPTET/Shiksha Mitra : From Facebook Wall


Shakul GuptaTeacher's Helpdesk
नियुक्त होंगे1.20 लाख शिक्षामित्र

ग्राम सभा स्तर पर नियुक्ति की तैयारी

प्राथमिक विालयों में दूर होगी शिक्षकों की कमी

बी. सिंह
इलाहाबाद। सूबे की सपा सरकार ने प्रदेश के प्राथमिक विालयों में 1.20 लाख शिक्षामित्रों की नियुक्ति करने का मन बनाया है। शासन स्तर पर इस मामले की तैयारी भी शुरू हो गई है। इनकी नियुक्ति ग्राम सभा स्तर पर की जाएगी। शिक्षामित्रों की नियुक्ति के संबंध में भी आरक्षण के नियम अपनाए जाएंगे। इसमें महिलाओं की संख्या 50 प्रतिशत तक निर्धारित की जाएगी। बाकी पुरुष संवर्ग से नियुक्ति होगी। हर गांव के स्कूलों में एक शिक्षामित्र रखा जायेगा। विदित हो कि जहां पहले से शिक्षामित्रों की नियुक्ति की जा चुकी है, वहां दोबारा नियुक्ति नहीं होगी। शिक्षामित्रों के पदों पर स्नातक योग्यताधारी की ही नियुक्ति की जाएगी।

इतनी बड़ी संख्या में शिक्षामित्रों की नियुक्ति होने से शिक्षकों की कमी एक हद तक पूरी हो जाएगी। इस समय सूबे के प्राथमिक स्कूलों में पौने तीन लाख शिक्षकों के पद खाली चल रहे हैं। इसके अलावा 72,825 बीएड योग्यताधारियों से शिक्षकों के खाली पदों पर नियुक्ति की तैयारी हो रही है। अगले माह दिसंबर 2012 में इन पदों को भरने केलिए विज्ञापन जारी हो जाएगा। इस मामले में हाईकोर्ट ने 7 दिसंबर तक का समय दे रखा है। मुख्यमंत्री भी शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति के मामले में घोषणा कर चुकेहैं। 5500 बीटीसी प्रशिक्षित शिक्षकों की भी नियुक्ति की जानी है। ये वे अभ्यर्थी हैं जिनका परीक्षाफल तकनीकी कारणों से रोका गया है। सपा सरकार प्राथमिक स्कूलों में उर्दू विषय के शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति करने में रुचि ले रही है। राज्य सरकार इसके पहले भी लगभग 60 हजार शिक्षामित्रों की नियुक्तियां कर चुकी हैं। बाद में इन्हें नियमित करने के लिए सरकार ने बीटीसी का प्रशिक्षण देने का निर्णय किया। इस समय पहली किस्त में शिक्षामित्रों को बड़ी संख्या में प्रशिक्षण दिया जा रहा है। प्रशिक्षण हासिल कर निकलते ही इनको नियमित शिक्षक के रूप में नियुक्त मान लिया जाएगा। ये सभी नियुक्तियां सर्व शिक्षा अभियान के तहत होंगी। इस मद में व्यय होने वाली धनराशि का 75 प्रतिशत बजट केंद्र सरकार खुद देगी। केवल 25 प्रतिशत बजट का राज्य सरकार को अपनी ओर से इंतजाम करना होगा।ग्राम सभा स्तर पर नियुक्ति की तैयारी


UPTET : From Facebook Wall


UPTET : From Facebook Wall

Teacher's HelpDesk Group -

Shakul Gupta
file CM ke paas hai
date ghataakar 31 march 2013 ki gayi hai
saayad tabhi RGC center se permission ki baat kar raha hai




As per news (in pic ) - 
1.Teachers recruitment file is with CM.
2. 309,910 teachers recruitment is approved under RTE, And deadline for recruitment will not be extended i.e Last date is 31st March 2013.

3. Why matter is complicated - Recruitment rule for selection is changed.

Saturday, November 24, 2012

UPTET : बढ़ा बीएड डिग्रीधारकों का इंतजार , अटकलों के हवाले शिक्षक नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया


UPTET : बढ़ा बीएड डिग्रीधारकों का इंतजार ,

अटकलों के हवाले शिक्षक नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया


इलाहाबाद। राज्य मंत्रिमंडल की मुहर न लग पाने के कारण बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद के प्राथमिक स्कूलों में बीएड डिग्रीधारकों तथा शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) उत्तीर्ण अभ्यर्थियों का शिक्षक बनने का इंतजार एक बार फिर आगे बढ़ गया। वित्त विभाग, विधि विभाग ने बेसिक शिक्षा विभाग के 72,825 शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति के प्रस्ताव को हरी झंडी दे दी है किन्तु अभी तक मंत्रिमंडल की सहमति नहीं मिली है। ऐसी स्थिति में शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति का मामला एक बार फिर अटकलों के हवाले हो गया है। 

हाल ही में उच्च न्यायालय ने उप्र सरकार को शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति के मामले में विलंब पर फटकार लगाई थी। इसी के साथ सात दिसंबर 2012 तक शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति का विज्ञापन निकालने का निर्देश दिया था। उच्च न्यायालय के निर्देश पर शिक्षा विभाग शिक्षकों की सीधी भर्ती की प्रक्रिया तथा बेसिक शिक्षा नियमावली 1981 में संशोधन का प्रस्ताव तैयार कर वित्त तथा विधि विभाग से पत्रावली को मंजूरी हासिल कर लिया। इसी के बाद मंत्रिमंडल में इसकी मंजूरी मिलने के लिए पत्रावली भेजी गई फिलहाल सरकार ने उसे टाल दिया है। अब सारा दारोमदार मुख्यमंत्री की सहमति पर निर्भर है

अटकलों के हवाले शिक्षक नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया इलाहाबाद। 
केंद्रीय मानव संसाधन मंत्रालय ने राज्यों से सर्वशिक्षा अभियान के तहत शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति में तेजी लाने का निर्देश जारी किया है। उत्तर प्रदेश को 3,09,910 शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति की सहमति दी जा चुकी है। राज्यों को स्पष्ट हिदायत दी गई है कि अब समय सीमा नहीं बढ़ाई जाएगी। यानी 31 मार्च 2013 तक शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति का कार्य पूरा करना है। इस समय पूरे देश में 13 लाख शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति इसी दौरान होनी है। इससे बीएड तथा बीटीसी जैसे प्रशिक्षण हासिल करने वाले लोगों को शिक्षक बनने का रास्ता खुल जाएगा


News Source : Daily News Activist (24.11.12) / http://www.dailynewsactivist.com/Details.aspx?id=22097&boxid=97411714&eddate=11%2f24%2f2012
************************************************

दो लाख शिक्षक होंगे भर्तीःसीएम

सैफई (इटावा)। मुख्यमंत्री अखिलेश यादव ने कहा कि आगामी डेढ़-दो वर्षों में दो लाख से ज्यादा शिक्षकों के अलावा पुलिस और पीएसी में भी बड़ी संख्या में भर्तियां होंगी। नौकरी के लिए बेरोजगार अभी से बाकी चीजों से ध्यान हटाकर मेहनत से पढ़ाई पूरी करें। प्रदेश सरकार गांवों के पारंपरिक खेलों को आगे बढ़ाएगी। पिछली सरकार ने तो स्टेडियम में डायनामाइट लगा दिया था।
मुख्यमंत्री शुक्रवार को राष्ट्रीय महिला खेल कम्पटीशन के समापन समारोह को संबोधित कर रहे थे। वह दोपहर 1:20 बजे एसएस मैमोरियल कालेज में बने हैलीपैड पर उतरने के बाद सीधे स्टेडियम पहुंचे। वालीबाल का फाइनल मैच देखने के बाद उन्होंने कहा कि जो जीते और हारे हैं, सभी को बधाई। महिला खिलाड़ियों ने ओलंपिक में देश का नाम रोशन किया है। उन्होंने माना कि खेलकूद के मामलों में यूपी और बिहार थोड़ा पीछे हैं। क्रिकेट तो खेतों तक में खेला जा रहा है। सरकार गांवों के पारंपरिक खेलों को आगे बढ़ाएगी।
मुख्यमंत्री ने कहा कि मुलायम सिंह यादव ने ही प्रदेश में यश भारती पुरस्कार की शुुरुआत की थी। अब यह सम्मान राशि पांच लाख से बढ़ाकर 11 लाख रुपए कर दी गई है।


News Source : Amar Ujala (24.11.12) / http://epaper.amarujala.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20121124a_009174011&ileft=129&itop=357&zoomRatio=130&AN=20121124a_009174011
*****************************************
Teachers News : तीन साल में गृह जनपद जाएंगे सभी शिक्षक

इलाहाबाद : प्रदेश के सभी शिक्षक तीन साल के भीतर मनचाहे जिलों में तबादला पा सकेंगे। यह जानकारी आए बेसिक शिक्षा एवं बालविकास पुष्टाहार मंत्री रामगोविंद चौधरी ने दैनिक जागरण से बातचीत में दी। वह शुक्रवार देर शाम सर्किट हाउस पहुंचे। मंत्री शनिवार को तुलसीपुर में आयोजित एक कार्यक्रम में शिरकत करने जनपद आए हैं। उन्होंने बताया कि प्रदेश की बेसिक शिक्षा व्यवस्था कि स्थिति सुधारने लिए सपा सरकार कृतसंकल्प है। विद्यालयों में पठन-पाठन का माहौल बने इसके लिए बेसिक शिक्षकों को तीन साल के भीतर उनका तबादला इच्छित जनपदों में किया जाएगा। उन्होंने बताया कि तबादलों और तैनाती में पारदर्शिता बरते जाने के लिए अधिकारियों को स्पष्ट निर्देश दिए गए हैं। इसके लिए शासनादेश का कड़ाई से पालन किया जा रहा है। सरकार द्वारा संचालित सभी योजनाएं सही ढंग से क्रियान्वित हों, इसके लिए लगातार प्रयास जारी है। उन्होंने मीडिया से सहयोग की अपील करते हुए कहा कि वह सभी विद्यालयों में पढ़ाई कराने के लिए कृतसंकल्प हैं। प्रदेश के अध्यापक विद्यालयों में पढ़ाना चाहते हैं, सरकार उन्हें बेहतर माहौल देगी
News Source : Amar Ujala (24.11.12)
***************************************
Views from Face book / Facebook Wall : - >


Uptet Tet-Base Raj
Oh God....!!!!!
.
Kal kai news channels sahit bahut sari jagahon se news udayi ja rahi thi ki adhyapak sewa niymawali me sanshodhan ko manjoori mil gayi hai aur bharti gunank se hogi lekin aur ye udne wala dua chhant chuka hai,,aaj ki news kah rahi hai ki cabinet me koi prastav pass hi nahi hua....
.
Means,mtng me upasthit sabhi sajjan iss baat ko jante hain ki tet-merit se bharti k siway koi aur rasta hi nahi hai to parivartan kaisa,,old add se bharti k siway koi aur darwaja khulta hi nahi hai,,koun fatkar sun-na pasand karega court ki,,koun be-ijjati karwana pasand karega sabke samne,,so koi bhi decision nahi ho paya..jab decision nahi to kaisa G.O.,,kaisa new add,,???,,jab new add nahi to court me kya lekar jayegi sarkar??,,to ab aise me respected Tandanji k samne sirf aur sirf ek hi vikalp bachta hai,,7 Dec ko humare old add ko bhal kar den,,qki ab govt k pas koi aur bhana bhi nahi hai,isne khud hi to niymawali me change karne ki baat kahi thi to jab kuchh hua hi nahi to,,
.
.
old add zindabad tha,,hai,,aur rahega....ab kuchh aur nahi bcha,,humari bharti sirf aur sirf tet-merit se hi,,dusri koi soutan aa hi nahi payegi....
.
.
Jai Hind....Jai Bharat....Jai Tet....!!!!!
:
.
Shubh-Prabhat....!!!!!

****************************************

Nirbhai Singh >>
JIS PRAKAR SE KOI OLYMPIC PLAYER GAME ME FIRST AAYE AUR USE MEDAL NA MILE USI PRAKAR SE LAST HEARING ME HAMARI JEET HUI HAI.BHARTI AB KEWAL TET MERIT SE HI HOGI. NA TO ISME NAYE LOG ADD HO PAYENGE AUR NA HI AGE RELATED KOI PROBLEM HOGI. KYUNKI KUCH BHI CHANGE KARNE SE YACHIYO KA HIT PRABHAWIT HO JAYEGA. ISLIYE SARKAR AB IS MUDDE PER EK BAR FIR SE NYAY VIBHAG SE RAI LEGI.FRIEND HUM JEET KI TARAF BADH RAHE HAI.YE NEWS SACHIWALAYA KE EK BAHUT HI RELIABLE PERSON SE MILI HAI. BELEIVE KARNA YA NA KARNA APKI MARZI

******************

Mohammad Shakeel >>>Teacher's Helpdesk
Base badalna niyamawali me sanshodhan...etc
yeh sab bahane late karne ke thai hoga wahi jo pehle hona tha

******************
Blog's view - Many things will clear on 7th December 2012 during hearing in Allahabad Highcourt.
So wait and watch.
************************
If you want to say something , Please send email to - muskan24by7@gmail.com OR 
Share /Suggest your views through blog comments.

Thursday, November 22, 2012

RTE : नहीं बढ़ेगी आरटीई समय सीमा मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्री एमएम पल्लम राजू ने किया इनकार



RTE : नहीं बढ़ेगी आरटीई समय सीमा
मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्री एमएम पल्लम राजू ने किया इनकार


•13.5 लाख शिक्षकों के पद खाली, कैसे भरेंगे?
•कॉमन प्रवेश परीक्षा में नहीं होगा कोई बदलाव





नई दिल्ली। देश में प्राइमरी स्तर पर 13.5 लाख शिक्षकों के पद रिक्त हैं। आधे से अधिक स्कूलों में बाउंड्रीवाल, शौचालय तथा पीने के पानी की व्यवस्था नहीं है। कुछ राज्यों में पर्याप्त स्कूल भी नहीं बन पाये हैं फिर भी पांच महीने बाद यानी पहली अप्रैल से देश में शिक्षा के अधिकार कानून को लागू मान लिया जाएगा। इसके लिए जरूरी तैयारियों की समय सीमा बढ़ाने के कुछ राज्यों के प्रस्ताव को मानव संसाधन मंत्री ने अस्वीकार कर दिया है।
नए मानव संसाधन मंत्री पल्लम राजू ने बुधवार को एक प्रेस कांफ्रेंस में कहा कि हम बाकी समय में राज्यों से जरूरी सुविधाओं को जुटाने के लिए आवश्यक कदम उठाने को कह रहे हैं लेकिन राज्यों में पांच महीने में लाखों शिक्षकों की भर्ती कैसे संभव है इस बारे में वे कोई जवाब नहीं दे सके। जिन राज्यों में अभी हजारों की संख्या में स्कूल खोले जाने हैं वहां आरटीई कानून कैसे लागू हो सकेगा? इस सवाल पर मानव संसाधन मंत्री मौन हो जाते हैं। उत्तर प्रदेश, बिहार, उड़ीसा तथा राजस्थान जैसे कई प्रदेशों में आरटीई के तय मानकों के अनुरूप प्राथमिक शिक्षा के लिए ढांचा तैयार करने में अभी काफी समय व एवं धन की जरूरत पड़ेगी। क्या इन राज्यों के बिना देश में सबकों शिक्षा के अधिकार कानून का मकसद पूरा हो सकेगा। पल्लम राजू ने कहा कि वे उम्मीद करते हैं कि मार्च तक सब ठीक हो जाएगा? वे देश में आरटीई के माध्यम से प्राथमिक शिक्षा के बहुत मजबूत होने की भी उम्मीद रखते हैं।
पल्लम राजू ने कहा कि कुकिंग गैस की कीमतों में वृद्धि का असर मिड-डे मील योजनाओं पर नहीं पड़ने शिया जाएगा। क्या वे योजना के लिए ईंधन मद में अतिरिक्त बजट उपलब्ध कराएंगे या योजना के लिए सस्ते सिलेंडर सरकार से हासिल करेंगे।
पल्लम राजू ने कहा कि अभी यह तय नहीं है लेकिन मैं आश्वस्त करना चाहता हूं कि मिड-डे मील गुणवत्ता में गिरावट नहीं होने दी जाएगी।
उन्होंने यह भी कहा कि वे आईआईटी सहित विभिन्न इंजीनियरिंग कक्षाओं में प्रवेश के लिए होने वाली संयुक्त प्रवेश परीक्षा की प्रक्रिया को जारी रखेंगे। इसमें फिलहाल किसी तरह के बदलाव किए जाने की उनकी मंशा नहीं है।


News Source : Amar Ujala ( 22.11.12)
****************************************
Next 5 months, How 13.5 lakh teacer's post will be filled to implement RTE, Its a big question.
Many states conducted TET exam to implement RTE, but vacancies still not filled to compensate such requirements of teachers in schools.

UPTET : नियमावली में संशोधन से अभ्यर्थियों में ऊहापोह


UPTET : नियमावली में संशोधन से अभ्यर्थियों में ऊहापोह

इलाहाबाद। बेसिक शिक्षा नियमावली 1981 में नियमों में संशोधन की कवायद से टीईटी अभ्यर्थी खासे ऊहापोह में हैं। अभ्यर्थियों का कहना है कि नए संशोधन का क्या प्रारूप होगा इसका कुछ पता नहीं है। जबकि सहायक अध्यापक भर्ती मामले को लेकर दाखिल याचिका पर सुनवाई के समय हाईकोर्ट भी कह चुका है कि संशोधन आवश्यक नहीं है। मगर न्यायालय ने बेसिक शिक्षा सचिव को यह भी छूट दी है कि यदि सरकार संशोधन करना चाहती है तो सचिव उसकी समीक्षा करके ऐसा कर सकते हैं। न्यायालय ने नए संशोधन का प्रतिकूल प्रभाव याचियों पर नहीं डालने को भी कहा है। सहायक अध्यापक भर्ती के अभ्यर्थी सदानंद मिश्र, गणेश शंकर दीक्षित आदि का कहना है कि सरकार जानबूझकर विज्ञापन जारी करने में देरी कर रही है। नियमों में संशोधन का सिर्फ बहाना बनाया जा रहा है। जबकि भर्ती प्रक्रिया पिछले एक साल से लटकी है। भर्ती मामले में कोर्ट में अगली सुनवाई सात दिसंबर को होनी है। आदेश के अनुसार तब तक में सरकार को नया विज्ञापन जारी कर देना चाहिए। मगर अब तक इस दिशा में कोई कदम नहीं उठाया गया है



News Source : Amar Ujala (22.11.12)
************************************************
Uncertainty having no ending from a long time. Candidadte's hopes for job increases after govt. announced UPTET 2011 exam is safe.
But increases when govt. withdraw earlier published advertisement which has some problem due to issuing authority etc.
Different different news comes for change of selection criteria.
Candidate's are expecting good news from Allahabad HC on 7th Dec. 2012.
Blog's best wishes with UPTET candidate's on 7th for a good news.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

UPTET : शिक्षकों की भर्ती का प्रस्ताव स्थगित



UPTET : शिक्षकों की भर्ती का प्रस्ताव स्थगित 

लखनऊ। टीईटी पास बीएड बेरोजगारों को शिक्षक बनने के लिए अभी और इंतजार करना पड़ेगा। बेसिक स्कूलों में सीधे प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक रखने के लिए नियमावली संशोधन संबंधी प्रस्ताव को कैबिनेट से मंजूरी नहीं मिली। नियमावली संशोधन संबंधी प्रस्ताव को स्थगित कर दिया गया है अब इस पर बाद में निर्णय किया जाएगा। 


News Source : Amar Ujala (21.11.12)
****************************************


News Source: Hindustan Epaper (Lucknow, Page No. 8, 21.11.12)
****************************
News Analysis :
Uncertain Future
Yesterday it was in news that finance and law department give its approval. Now again a confusion arises in the minds of candidates, when and what will happen about their job. 
Uncertain Future

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

UPTET : What happens on Facebook

UPTET : What happens on Facebook 


Interesting discussions / Debate  :-



Lokendra Tyagi
50% tet ko waitaige milna hi chahiye.
tet merit group +acd merit group= all happy. 
but tet merit jindabad ye hamara huk hai.
Like · · Share · 9 minutes ago via mobile · 

Dukh Hrn Dham RadheRadhe jb acdmic ko pura seb mil rha hai to usme bntwara kyo krenge han agr crt mjbur kr de to sochenge..
3 minutes ago via mobile · Like


***********************************

Chandra Prakash Singhposted to >> Uptet Prt >>
4 hours ago
विज्ञापन उच्च न्यायालय इलाहाबाद के 6 नवम्बर को दिये गये निर्देशोँ के आधार पर ही मान्य होँगेँ जिसमेँ स्पष्ट कहा गया है अगर किसी भी प्रकार के संशोधन की आवश्यकता पड़ती है तो इसके लिये न्यायिक दायित्व बेशिक शिक्षा सचिव उ.प्र. को प्रदान किया जाता है। व ऐसा कोई भी विज्ञापन न जारी किया जाय जिससे याचिका कर्ताओँ के अधिकारो को हानि पहुँचे।।

अब नये विज्ञापन को वैध ठहराने की पूरी जिम्मेदारी बेशिक शिक्षा सचिव की है।
अब देखना ये है, कि चयन प्रक्रिया मेँ बदलाव के पक्ष मेँ जो तर्क कोर्ट मेँ रखेजाते है उनसे कोर्ट कितना सहमत या असहमत रहती है।
यही तर्क ही चयन प्रक्रिया के आधार को अन्तिम रूप प्रदान करेँगेँ।।

*********************

Dharm Chand posted to >>> Uptet Prt
4 hours ago
Bhai please koi ye bata sakta he ki gudank pahle wala 12,6,3 rahega ya BED 30% 
kindly tell me

********************

Pratyush Kushwaha posted to  >>Uptet Prt
4 hours ago
ab koye bhai ye batayega ki merit purane gunank par banegi ya phir new gunank par

*****************

Dileep Gangwarposted to >>> Uptet Prt
5 hours ago
Ritesh Ojha
अध्यापक सेवा नियमावली के 13वें नियम को परिवर्तित करके उसमें प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक की नियुक्ति काप्रावधान कर दिया गया है ॥
अध्यापक सेवा नियमावली में गुणांक मेरिट(Quality points) का 14(क) वैसे का वैसा ही रखा गया है अर्थात जो लोग अब तक अपना गुणांक 30% बी0एड0 के साथ जोड़ रहे थे वह अब एक बार पुनः 12,6,3 से जोड़ना शुरू कर सकते हैं ......क्योंकि हमारे अधिकतर मित्रों का मात्र यही कार्य है ॥
बाकी सब यथैव है------------- -----
लेकिन नियुक्ति टी0ई0टी0 में प्राप्त अंकों के आधार पर ही होगी॥ यह भी सत्य है ॥न्यायालय और हमें केवल सरकार के अगले कदम की प्रतीक्षा है ॥

********************************

Vinod Prt posted to >>> Uptet Prt
7 hours ago
UP Cabinet ki mahtvapurn baithak sampann-

1.Adhyapak Seva Niymavali Sanshodhan ko manjuri.

2.Gunank Merit ke aadhar par chayan hoga.

3.Jilewar avedan mange jayenge.thanks News Source-Etv up news

********************

Chandra Prakash Singh  posted to  >>> Uptet Prt
8 hours ago
विज्ञापन एक बार जारी किया जाता है। जिसे शासन स्तर पर पूरी तौर पर इरादा बनाकर, कृत संकल्प होकर जारी किया जाता है। इसमेँ कोई भी अनावश्यक बदलाव किसी भी स्थिति मे न्यायसंगत नहीं हो सकता है। चयन का आधार बदलना तो पूर्ण रूपेण अन्याय होगा। मात्रा से अधिक अनमितता पाये जाने पर परीक्षा रद्द की जा सकती है पर ऐसा तभी संभव है जब पर्याप्त मात्रा मेँ अनमितता की पुष्टि हो जाय ।। 

आज कैबिनेट मीटिँग मेँ केवल अनुच्छेद 14 परिषदीय प्राथमिक विद्यालयोँ मेँ अध्यापको की शीधी भर्ती की व्यवस्था प्रदान करने हेतु नियमावली मेँ संशोधन को मंजूरी प्राप्त होगी।
जिसे वर्तमामान सरकार ने अपने संशोधन मेँ 23 अगस्त को बदल दिया था । यानि पहले नियुक्ति होगी फिर प्रशिक्षण दिए जाने का प्रावधान किया जायेगा ।।

*****************

Jaiprakash Singh Tiger
DEAR friends.....
dhyan de , ab ye bharti rukane wali nahi , jo ye soch rahe hain ki hum bharti rok denge aur TET MERIT par hi selection hoga , we galat soch rahe hain, bcz 
1. HC ye matter bharti puri hone tak nahi chhodegi..tab koi kaise apil kar payega
2. SC jane walon ka sath ab kam milega 10-20 ke aas pass 
3. SC me ek bahas ki waquil ki fees hi lagabhag 1.5-2 lakh hogi, to sochiye agar gov ne lagabhag 6 date bhi le li to kharchha 10-12 lakh rupaye ka aayega..
4. Agar 10-20 date le li to 25-40 lakh rupaye ka aayega.. 
to sochiye itane paise matra 10-20 tetians TET MERIT wale kaha se layenge ,,kya apana ghar ujadenge YA apane sath jin tet merit walon ko ullu banaye hai unaka ghar barbaad karenge, aur bacha khucha chande ka paisa hadap kar jayenge.
...aur yadi SC se bhi na rahat mili to unka to sab kuchh khatam ,,paise bhi barbaad...
AB ye new GUNANK merit se kisi ka kuchh nahi bigadega, isase sabako saman awasar milega ,, ha NCTE NE ye to nahi bola ki CHAYAN KA AADHAR TET ME PRAPT NUMBERON KO HI BANAYA JAYE.. TO fir kahe tet merit chillakar apana waqt aur paisa dono barabaad kar rahe hain aap log..
.....so ye galatfahami nikal de ki ab yah bharti dobara rukegi...
so enjoy only bharti time...jai BHARTI

******************
Chyan Ka Aadhaar pichlee baar court mein - 
http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1582274

****************

Abha Awasthi >>>
adhyapak sewa niyamawali me sanshodhan ko cabinet ki manzoori to mil gayi par dekhna ye hai ki iske bavjood bhi ye advt kab nikalte hain aur kahin aage is bharti me phr koi pench na phans jaye.... aur court k order ke anusar advt nikala jaye aur ye sab kaam jald se jald ho..

********

Shalabh Tiwari
आज फिर से गुणांक वालों को प्रसन्न होने का मौका उत्तर प्रदेश कैबिनेट ने दिया ,,,,कुछ टेट मेरिट वाले साथी पूर्व की भांति भयभीत होने के रोमांच का अनुभव करने में मशगूल हैं ,,,,किसी भी तरह से भर्ती के समर्थक फिर से संशय में आ गये हैं ,,,,वैसे इस बार उनका झुकाव किस ओर है क्या ये बात कोई मझे बता सकता है ,,,,,,,,टण्डन साहब सोच रहे होंगे 6 novemberका order internet पर upload करवाने की जगह अगर अमर उजाला में विज्ञापन के रूप में निकलवा दिया होता तो बेचारे एकैडमिक वाले बेवकूफ बनने से कम से कम इस बार तो बच ही जाते ,,,अब सात दिसंबर को टण्डन साहब के सामने अत्यंत कठिन कार्य आने वाला है ,,जली हुई रस्सी का बल निकालना ,,कुत्ते की दुम को सीधा करना,,भैंस के आगे बीन बजाना ,,,,,,,
हे भगवान!!!!!!!! जज बनने के बाद जाने क्या -क्या करना पडता है,,,,

UPTET : 72 हजार प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों की भर्ती को आज मंजूरी


UPTET : 72 हजार प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों की भर्ती को आज मंजूरी



-कैबिनेट बैठक आज

जागरण ब्यूरो, लखनऊ : मुख्यमंत्री अखिलेश यादव ने मंगलवार को 11 बजे से कैबिनेट की बैठक बुलायी है। बैठक में परिषदीय प्राथमिक स्कूलों में रिक्त 72,825 पदों पर प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों को नियुक्त करने के लिए उप्र बेसिक शिक्षा (अध्यापक) सेवा नियमावली 1981 में संशोधन के प्रस्ताव को मंजूरी मिल सकती है। प्रस्ताव के मुताबिक प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों के प्रारंभिक शिक्षाशास्त्र में छह महीने का विशेष प्रशिक्षण पूरा करने के बाद उन्हें सहायक अध्यापक के पद पर स्थायी नियुक्ति दे दी जाएगी

अशासकीय सहायताप्राप्त जूनियर हाईस्कूलों में शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति के लिए केंद्र या राज्य सरकार द्वारा आयोजित अध्यापक पात्रता परीक्षा सीटीईटी/टीईटी को अनिवार्य करने के लिए उप्र मान्यताप्राप्त बेसिक स्कूल (जूनियर हाईस्कूल अध्यापकों की भर्ती और सेवा की शर्तें) नियमावली 1978 में भी संशोधन का प्रस्ताव कैबिनेट के अनुमोदन के लिए प्रस्तुत किया जाएगा। अशासकीय सहायताप्राप्त जूनियर हाईस्कूलों में शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया को समयबद्ध तरीके से संपन्न करने का संशोधन भी प्रस्तावित है। नि:शुल्क एवं अनिवार्य बाल शिक्षा का अधिकार अधिनियम के तहत निजी स्कूलों की पहली कक्षा की 25 फीसदी सीटों पर शैक्षिक व सामाजिक रूप से पिछड़े वर्गों के बच्चों को प्रवेश दिलाने के मकसद से अलाभित समूह व दुर्बल आय वर्ग की परिभाषाओं पर भी कैबिनेट की मुहर लगवाने की तैयारी है


News Source : Jagran (19.11.12)
************************************

Monday, November 19, 2012

U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981


U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981

Rule 15 deals with notification of vacancies and preparation of list of eligible candidates for certain posts


Rule 15 is clear that minimum educational qualification for teachers laid down by an authority authorized by the Central Government shall be applicable for all schools referred to in clause (n) of Section 2. The State Government in its turn on 07.09.2011 proceeded to authorize the Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad to hold the T.E.T., and accordingly guidelines had also been issued to be complied with for passing T.E.T. (Teacher Eligibility Test) 


Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1981934


In respect to teachers of Primary Schools maintained by the Board, Rules 1981 have been framed known as U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, published in U.P. Gazette (Extra Ordinary) on 03.01.1981. The application of these rules is provided in Rule 3, as under:
"Extent of application.- These rules shall apply to :
(i) All teachers of local bodies transferred to the Board under Section 9 of the Act; and
(ii) all teachers employed for the Basic and Nursery Schools established by the Board."

Rule 4 deals with the strength of the service. Rule 5deals with the source of recruitment. Rule 6 deals with the age. Rule 8 deals with the academic qualifications and mentions that essential qualification of the candidates for appointment to a post referred to in clause (5) of rule 5 would be as shown below against each. Rule 8 is being extracted below:
"8. Academic Qualifications:- The essential qualifications of candidates for appointment to a post referred to in clause (a) of Rule 5 shall be as shown below against each:

Post
Academic Qualifications
(I) Mistress of Nursery school
Certificate of teaching (Nursery) from a recognized training institution in Uttar Pradesh or any other training qualification recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto
(ii) Assistant Master and Assistant Mistress of Junior Basic School
A Bachelor's Degree from a University established by law in India or a Degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto together with the training qualification consisting of a Basic Teacher's Certificate, Hindustani Teacher's Certificate, Junior Teacher's Certificate, Certificate of Teaching or any other training course recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto:
Provided that the essential qualification for a candidate who has passed the required training course shall be the same which was prescribed for admission to the said training course.

(2) The essential qualifications of candidates for appointment to a post referred to in sub-clause (iii) and (iv) of clause (h) of Rule 5 for teaching Science, Mathematics, Craft or any language other than Hindi and Urdu shall be as follows:
(I)A Bachelor's Degree from a University established by law in India or a Degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto with Science, Mathematics, Craft or particular language, as the case may be, as one of the subjects, and
(II)Training qualification consisting of a Basic Teacher's Certificate, Hindustani Teacher's Certificate, Junior Teacher's Certificate, Certificate of Teaching or any other training course recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto.
(3) The minimum experience of candidates for appointment to a post referred to in clause (b) of Rule 5 shall be as shown below against each:

Post
Experience
(i) Head Mistress of Nursery School
At least five years' teaching experience as permanent Mistress of Nursery School
(ii) Headmaster or Head Mistress of Junior Basic School and Assistant Master or Assistant Mistress of Senior Basic School
At least five years' teaching experience as permanent Assistant Mistress or Assistant Master of Junior Basic School, Assistant Master or Assistant Mistress of Junior Basic School and Assistant Master or Assistant Mistress of Senior Basic School
(iii) Head Master or Head Mistress for Senior Basic School
At least five years' experience as permanent Head Master or Head Mistress of Junior Basic School or permanent and Assistant Master or Assistant Mistress of Senior Basic School, as the case may be.
Provided that if sufficient number of suitable or eligible candidates are not available for promotion to the posts mentioned as serial numbers (ii) or (iii) the field of eligibility may be extended by the Board by giving relaxation in the period of experience.

(4) The essential qualifications of candidates for appointment to the post referred to in clause (a) and sub-clause (iii) and (iv) of clause (b) of Rule 5 for teaching Urdu Language shall be as follows:
(i) A Bachelor's Degree from a University established by law in India or a Degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto with Urdu as one of the subjects.
Note: A candidate who does not possess the aforesaid qualification in Urdu shall be eligible for appointment if he possesses a Master's Degree in Urdu.

(ii) Basic Teacher's Certificate from any of the training centers in Lucknow, Agra, Mawana in district Meerut and Sakaldiha in district Chandauli established by the Government for imparting training for teaching Urdu or any other training qualification recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto."

Rule 10 of the aforesaid Rules deals with the authority of relaxation for ex-servicemen and certain other categories, which is inclusive of compassionate appointment also, and the same reads as below:
"10. Relaxation for ex-servicemen and certain categories.- Relaxation, if any, from the maximum age limit, educational qualifications or/and any procedural requirements of recruitment in favour of the ex-servicemen, disabled military personnel, dependents of military personnel dying in action, dependents of Board's servants dying in harness and sportsmen, in accordance with the general rules and orders of the Government in this behalf in force at the time of recruitment."

Rule 14 deals with determination of vacancies and preparation of list.

Rule 15 deals with notification of vacancies and preparation of list of eligible candidates for certain posts/

 Rule 16 deals with constitution of selection committee. Rule 17 deals with procedure for direct recruitment to a post for teaching a language. Rule 17A deals with procedure for direct recruitment to a post for teaching subjects other than language. Rule 18 deals with deals with procedure for recruitment by promotion. Rule 19 deals with appointment.
In respect of planned and coordinated development for teachers education, the provisions of 1993 Act has been enforced. This is a Central Act enacted by Parliament and after receiving assent of the President on 29.12.1993 was published in the Gazette of India, (Extra.) Part II, Section 1, dated 30.12.1993. Section 1(3) provides that Act 1993 shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may appoint by notification in initial gazette. Pursuant thereto the Central Government by notification dated 1.07.1995 appointed the same day i.e. 01.7.1995 for enforcement of Act 1993.
The Act 1993 was enacted with an objective of achieving planned and coordinated development for teacher education system throughout the country, the regulation and properly maintenance of norms and standards in teacher education system and for matters connected therewith. The Act 1993 contemplates establishment of a council called as "National Council For Teacher Education" (hereinafter referred as "NCTE") and its functions are enumerated in detail in Section 12 of Act 1993. It clearly talks of planned and co-ordinated development of teacher education, and determination and maintenance of standards for teacher education. It is in this regard various subjects and functions of NCTE have been enumerated in Section 12 from Clauses (a) to (n).
The Act 1993 contemplates recognition and permission of NCTE for running courses or training in teacher education. Section 17 provides, if course or training in teacher education has been imparted or obtained in violation of the provisions of the Act, such course or training shall not be treated a valid qualification for the purpose of employment under Central Act, State Government, University, any School/College or other educational body aided by Central or the State Government. The restriction imposed by Section 17(4) is only to the extent that a training or course in teacher education which does not conform to the various provisions of Act 1993 shall not be a valid qualification for employment as stated above, and nothing more and nothing less. The entire Act 1993 does not talk of the manner in which appointments of teachers shall be made, the eligibility to be laid down for appointment of teachers in Primary Schools etc. except qualification. It is confined to the standard and quality of teachers' education. NCTE can lay down minimum qualification which may be prescribed for appointment of a teacher but it does not control the mode, manner and other relevant provisions regarding recruitment and appointment of such teachers. In State of U.P. and Others Vs. Bhupendra Nath Tripathi and Ors. 2010 (5) ESC 630, the Apex Court has clarified this situation that NCTE can lay down minimum qualification for appointment of teacher by competent appointing authority or the authority competent to frame rules and regulations may lay down any qualification over and above the minimum qualification prescribed by N.C.T.E.
Article 41 in Part IV (Directive Principles of State Policy) provides that the State shall, within the limits of its economic capacity and development, make effective provision for securing right to work, to education etc. Similarly Article 45 provides that State shall endeavour to provide, within a period of ten years from the commencement of Constitution, free and compulsory education for all children until they complete the age of fourteen years. Said provisions have come up before Apex Court Court in Mohini Jain Vs. State of Karnataka, AIR 1992 SC 1858 and Unni Krishnan J.P. Vs. State of A.P., AIR 1993 SC 2178 and the cases followed thereafter observing Primary Education to children from age of 6 to 14 years as a constitutional right, efforts were made by Governments, Central and State both, to expand primary education by establishing primary schools at Village Panchayat level in a major way and this really gave opportunity to open number of new schools and correspondingly increase in number of teachers requiring to man these institution. Parliament also recognized above right by inserting Article 21A in the Constitution i.e. 'Right to Education', by Constitution (86th Amendment) Act, 2002, and, simultaneously inserted Clause (k) in Article 51A vide Section 4 of Constitution (86th Amendment) Act, 2002. The Parliament also in furtherance of the above constitutional provisions, come forward by enacting Act 2009 published in Gazette of India on 27.8.2009. By virtue of Section 1(3) of Act 2009, it has been given effect from 01.4.2010.
One of the major change it has brought, besides other, is that no Primary School other than a school established, owned or controlled by the appropriate Government or local body after commencement of 2009 Act shall be established or function without obtaining a certificate of recognition from such authority, as may be prescribed. For the purpose of seeking recognition, the school has to conform the norms and standard specified in Section 19 of Act 2009 read with the schedule appended thereto. The Act 2009, vide Section 23(1), also provides that any person possessing such minimum qualification, as laid down by an academic authority authorized by the Central Government, by notification, shall be eligible for appointment as a teacher.
Section 23 (2) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 further proceeds to mention that where a State does not have adequate institutions offering courses for training in teacher education or teachers possessing minimum qualifications as laid down under sub-section (1) are not available in sufficient numbers, the Central Government may, if it deems necessary, by notification relax the minimum qualifications required for appointment as a teacher, for such period, not exceeding five years, as may be specified in that notification. A proviso has also been added to the aforesaid sub-section (2) of Section 23 mentioning that a teacher who at the commencement of this Act, does not possess minimum qualification as laid down under sub-section (1), shall acquire such minimum qualification within a period of five years. For the sake of convenience the provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 23 are being excerpted below:


"23. Qualifications for appointment and terms and conditions of service of teachers.- (1) Any person possessing such minimum qualifications, as laid down by an academic authority authorized by the Central Government by notification shall be eligible for appointment as a teacher.
(2) Where a State does not have adequate institutions offering courses for training in teacher education or teachers possessing minimum qualifications as laid down under sub-section (1) are not available in sufficient numbers, the Central Government may, if it deems necessary, by notification relax the minimum qualifications required for appointment as a teacher, for such period, not exceeding five years, as may be specified in that notification.
Provided that a teacher who at the commencement of this Act, does not possess minimum qualification as laid down under sub-section (1), shall acquire such minimum qualification within a period of five years.

In exercise of powers conferred by Section 38 of 2009 Act, Rules have been framed and the same have been published in the gazette dated 09.04.2010. Part VI of the said Rules deals with the term "teacher". Rule 17 deals with minimum qualification, rule 18 deals with relaxation of minimum qualification, rule 19 deals with acquiring minimum qualifications. Rules 17, 18 and 19 of the aforesaid Rules are being quoted below:
"17. Minimum Qualifications.- (1) The Central Government shall, within one month of the appointed date, notify an academic authority for laying down the minimum qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a teacher.
(2)The academic authority notified under sub-rule (1) shall within three months of such notification, lay down the minimum qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a teacher in an elementary school.
(3)The minimum qualifications laid down by the academic authority referred in in sub-rule (1) shall be applicable for every school referred to in clause (n) of Section 2.
18. Relaxation of minimum qualifications.- (1) The State Government and Union Territory shall, within six months from commencement of the Act, estimate the teacher requirements as per the norms in the Schedule of all schools referred to in clause (n) of Section 2
(2) Where as State Government or Union Territory does not have adequate institutions offering courses or training in teacher education, or persons possessing minimum qualifications as notified in sub-rule (2) of rule 17 are not available in sufficient numbers in relation to the requirement of teachers estimated under sub-rule (1) the State Government or the Union Territory shall request, within one year of the commencement of the Act, the Central Government for relaxation of the prescribed minimum qualifications.
(3) On receipt of the request referred to in sub rule (2), the Central Government shall examine the request of the State Government or the Union Territory and may, by notification relax the prescribed minimum qualifications.
(4) The notification referred to in sub rule (3) shall specify the nature of relaxation and the time period, not exceeding thee years, but not beyo9nd five years from the commencement of the Act, within which the teachers appointed under the relaxed conditions acquire the minimum qualifications specified by the academic authority notified under sub-section (1) of Section 23.
(5) After six months from the commencement of the Act, no appointment of teacher for any school can be made in respect o any person not possessing the minimum qualifications notified in sub-rule (2) of Rule 17, without the notification of relaxation referred to in sub-rule (3).
(6) a person appointed as a teacher within six months of the commencement of the Act, must possess as least the academic qualifications nor lower than higther secondary school certificate or equivalent.
19. Acquiring minimum qualifications. - (1) The State Government and Union Territory shall provide adequate teacher education facilities to ensure that all teachers in schools referred to in sub-clause (I), and schools owned and managed by the Central Government or the State Government or Union Territory or local authority under sub-clause (iii) of clause (n) of Section 2, who doe not possess the minimum qualifications laid down under sub-rule (2) of rule 17 at the time of commencement of the Act, to acquire such minimum qualifications within a period of five years from the commencement of the Act.
(2) For a teacher, or a school referred to in sub-clause (ii) and (iv) of clause (n) of Section 2 and of a school referred to in sub clause (iii) of clause (n) of Section 2 not owned and managed by the Central Government, State Government or Union Territory or local authority, who doe not possess the minimum qualifications laid down under sub-rule (2) of rule 17 at the time of commencement of the Act, the management of such school shall enable such teacher to acquire such minimum qualifications within a period of five years from the date of commencement of the Act."

In exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 23 of 2009 Act, the Central Government has authorized the National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) as Academic Authority to lay down minimum qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as teacher. In exercise of the said authority, the N.C.T.E. has proceeded to lay down minimum qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as teacher. Said Notification has been published on 23.08.2000, and thereafter fresh notification has been issued with modifications on 29.07.2011. Relevant extract of the same is extracted below:
"NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 29th July, 2011

F.No.61-1/2011/NCTE/N&S).-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of the Section 23 of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (35 of 2009) and in pursuance of the Notification No.S.O. 750(E) dated 31st March, 2010 issued by the Department of School Education and Literacy, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) hereby makes the following amendments to the Notification No.215 dated 25th August, 2010 published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-III, Section-4, vide F.No.61-1/2011-NCTE (N&S), dated the 23rd August, 2010, laying down the minimum qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a teacher (hereby referred to as the Principal Notification), namely :-

(I) For sub-para (i) of para 1 of the Principal Notification, the following shall be substituted, namely:-

1. Minimum Qualifications:-
(i) Classes I-V

(a) Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50% marks and 2-year Diploma in Elementary Education (by whatever name known)
OR
Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 45% marks and 2-year Diploma in Elementary Education (by whatever name known), in accordance with the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure), Regulations, 2002.
OR
Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50% marks and 4-year Bachelor of Elementary Education (B.El.Ed.)
OR
Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50% marks and 2-year Diploma in Education (Special Education)
OR
Graduation and two year Diploma in Elementary Education (by whatever name known)
AND
(b) pass in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), to be conducted by the appropriate Government in accordance with the Guidelines 16

framed by the NCTE for the pourpose.

(II) For sub-para (ii) of para 1 of the Principal Notification, the following shall be substituted, namely :-

1 (ii) Classes VI - VIII

(a) Graduation and 2-year Diploma in Elementary Education (by whatever name known)
OR
Graduation with at 50% marks and 1-year Bachelor ion Education (B.Ed.)
OR
Graduation with at least 45% marks and 1-year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed.), in accordance with the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations issued from time to time in this regard.
OR
Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50% marks and 4-year Bachelor in Elementary Education (B.El.Ed.)
OR
Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with at least 50% marks and 4-year B.A./B.Sc.Ed. or B.A. Ed./B.Sc.Ed.
OR
Graduation with at least 50% marks and 1-year B.Ed. (Special Education)
AND
(b) Pass in Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), to be conducted by the 17

appropriate Government in accordance with the Guidelines framed by the NCTE for the purpose.

(III) For para 3 of the Principal Notification the following shall be substituted, namely:-

(i) Training to be undergone:-A person - (a) with Graduation with at least 50% marks and B.Ed. qualification or with at least 45% marks and 1-year Bachelor in Education (B.Ed.), in accordance with the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations issued from time to time in this regard shall also be eligible for appointment to Class I to V up to 1st January, 2012, provided he/she undergoes, after appointment, an NCTE recognized 6-month Special Programme in Elementary Education;

(b) with D.Ed. (Special Education) or B.Ed. (Special Education) qualification shall undergo, after appointment an NCTE recognized 6-month Special Programme in Elementary Education.

(ii) Reservation Policy :

Relaxation up to 5% in the qualifying marks shall be allowed to the candidates belonging to reserved categories, such as ST/ST/OBC/PH.

(IV) For para 5 of the Principal Notification, the following shall be substituted, namely:-

5.(a) Teacher appointed after the date of this notification in certain cases:-Where an appropriate Government or local authority or a shool has issued an advertisement to initiate the process of appointment of teachers prior to the date of this Notification, such appointments may be made in accordance with the NCTE (Determination of Minimum Qualifications for Recruitment of Teachers in Schools) Regulations, 2001 (as amended from time to time).

(b)The minimum qualification norms referred to in this Notification apply to teachers of Languages, Social Studies, Mathematics, Science, etc. In respect of teachers for Physical Education, the minimum qualification norms for Physical Education teachers referred to in NCTE Regulation dated 3rd November, 2001 (as amended from time to time) shall be applicable. For teachers of Art Education, Craft Education, Home Science, Work Education, etc. the existing eligibility norms prescribed by the State Governments and other school managements shall be applicable till such time the NCTE lays down the minimum qualifications in respect of such teachers."

A perusal of the aforesaid notification would go to show that minimum qualification has been provided for a person to be eligible for appointment as teacher and in addition to it, it has also been provided that the incumbent has to pass Teacher Eligibility Test (T.E.T.) to be conducted by the appropriate Government in accordance with the guidelines framed by the N.C.T.E. for the purpose and paragraph 5 (a) and 5 (b) of said circular has carved out exception to the applicability of said Circular. In the State of U. P. Rules have been framed known as U.P. Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2011, and therein part VI thereof deals with ''teacher'. Rule 15 deals with minimum qualification of teachers, rule 16 deals with relaxation of minimum qualification, rule 17 deals with acquiring of minimum qualifications. Said Rules have been enforced with effect from 27th July, 2011. The aforesaid Rules 15, 16 and 17 of the aforesaid Rules are being quoted below:

"15. Minimum qualification of teachers (Section 23 (1).- The minimum educational qualifications for teachers laid down by an authority authorized by the Central Government, by notification, shall be applicable for every school referred to in clause (n) of Section 2.
16.Relaxation of minimum qualification (Section 23 (2).- (1) The State Government shall estimate the teacher requirement as per the norms in the Schedule for all schools referred to in clause (n) of Section 2 within the State.
(2) If teachers possessing prescribed minimum qualifications are not available as estimated under sub-rule (1), then the State Government shall request the Central Government by 31st March, for relaxation of the prescribed minimum qualification.
(3) The State Government shall take necessary action after the notification issued by the Central Government, for relaxation in the minimum qualification on the request under sub-rule (2).
(4) The relaxation from minimum qualifications shall be for maximum period of five years from the commencement of the Act, i.e. till 31st March, 2015, within such period the teachers appointed under relaxed condition shall acquire the minimum educational qualifications prescribed under rule 15.
(5) No appointment of teacher for any school can be made in respect of any person not possessing the minimum qualifications prescribed under rule 15 without the notification referred to in sub-rule (3).
17. Acquiring of minimum qualification (proviso to Section 23 (2).- The State Government shall made a request to the academic authority notified by the Central Government for enhancement of capacity of teacher education and for providing required facilities for distant mode teacher training to ensure that all teachers in schools established, owned or controlled by the State Government or a local authority or specified schools, who do not possess the minimum qualifications laid down under Rule 15 at the time of commencement of the Act, acquire such minimum qualifications within a period of five years from the commencement of the Act. The State Government shall after obtaining the approval as per requirement provide for training of all such teachers.
(2) The management of aided or unaided schools shall enable such teachers, who do possess the minimum qualifications laid down under Rule 15 at the time of commencement of the Act, to acquire the same within a period of five years from the commencement of the Act."

Thereafter, in the State of U.P. amendment has been introduced in the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 on 09.11.2011, and Rule 8 thereof has been amended known as U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service (Twelfth Amendment) Rules, 2011 . A chart containing existing rule as well as amended rule is being extracted below:

Column -I Existing Rule
Column-II Rule as hereby substituted

"8. Academic Qualifications:- The essential qualifications of candidates for appointment to a post referred to in clause (a) of Rule 5 shall be as shown below against each:
"8. Academic Qualifications:- The essential qualifications of candidates for appointment to a post referred to in clause (a) of Rule 5 shall be as shown below against each:
Post
Academic Qualifications
Post
Academic Qualifications
(i) Mistress of Nursery School
Certificate of teaching (Nursery) from a recognized training institution in Uttar Pradesh or any other training qualification recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto
Mistress of Nursery School
Bachelor's Degree from a University established by law in India or a degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto together with the Certificate of teaching (Nursery) from recognized training institution of Uttar Pradesh or any other training course recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto and have passed teacher eligibility test conducted by the Government of Uttar Pradesh.
(ii) Assistant Master and Assistant Mistress of Junior Basic School
A Bachelor's Degree from a University established by law in India or a Degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto together with the training qualification consisting of a Basic Teacher's Certificate, Hindustani Teacher's Certificate, Junior Teacher's Certificate, Certificate of Teaching or any other training course recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto:
Provided that the essential qualification for a candidate who has passed the required training course shall be the same which was prescribed for admission to the said training course.
(ii) Assistant Master and Assistant Mistress of Junior Basic School
Bachelor's degree from a University established by law in India or a degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto together with any other training qualification consisting of a Basic Teacher's Certificate (BTC), two years' BTC (Urdu) Vishist BTC and have passed teacher eligibility test conducted by the Government of Uttar Pradesh.

(2) The essential qualifications of candidates for appointment to a post referred to in sub-clause (iii) and (iv) of clause (h) of Rule 5 for teaching Science, Mathematics, Craft or any language other than Hindi and Urdu shall be as follows:
(2) The essential qualifications of candidates for appointment to a post referred to in sub-clause (iii) and (iv) of clause (b) of Rule 5 for teaching Science, Mathematics, Craft or any language other than Hindi and Urdu shall be as follows:
(i) A Bachelor's Degree from a University established by law in India or a Degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto with Science, Mathematics, Craft or particular language, as the case may be, as one of the subjects, and
(I) A Bachelor's Degree from a University established by law in India or a Degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto with Science, Mathematics, Craft or particular language, as the case may be, as one of the subjects, and
(ii) Training qualification consisting of a Basic Teacher's Certificate, Hindustani Teacher's Certificate, Junior Teacher's Certificate, Certificate of Teaching or any other training course recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto.
(ii) Training qualification consisting of a Basic Teacher's Certificate, Certificate of Teaching or any other training course recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto and have passed teacher eligibility test conducted by the Government of Uttar Pradesh.

(iii) Head Master or Head Mistress for Senior Basic School
At least five years' experience as permanent Head Master or Head Mistress of Junior Basic School or permanent and Assistant Master or Assistant Mistress of Senior Basic School, as the case may be.
Provided that if sufficient number of suitable or eligible candidates are not available for promotion to the posts mentioned as serial numbers (ii) or (iii) the field of eligibility may be extended by the Board by giving relaxation in the period of experience.
(iii) Head Master or Head Mistress for Senior Basic School
At least three years' experience as permanent Head Master or Head Mistress of Junior Basic School or permanent and Assistant Master or Assistant Mistress of Senior Basic School, as the case may be.
Provided that if sufficient number of suitable or eligible candidates are not available for promotion to the posts mentioned at serial numbers (ii) or (iii) the field of eligibility may be extended by the Board by giving relaxation in the period of experience.

(4) The essential qualifications of candidates for appointment to the post referred to in clause (a) and sub-clause (iii) and (iv) of clause (b) of Rule 5 for teaching Urdu Language shall be as follows:
(4) The essential qualifications of candidates for appointment to the post referred to in clause (a) and sub-clause (iii) and (iv) of clause (b) of Rule 5 for teaching Urdu Language shall be as follows:
(i) A Bachelor's Degree from a University established by law in India or a Degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto with Urdu as one of the subjects.
Note: A candidate who does not possess the aforesaid qualification in Urdu shall be eligible for appointment if he possesses a Master's Degree in Urdu.
(i) A Bachelor's Degree from a University established by law in India or a Degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto with Urdu as one of the subjects.
Note: A candidate who does not possess the aforesaid qualification in Urdu shall be eligible for appointment if he possesses a Master's Degree in Urdu.

(ii) Basic Teacher's Certificate from any of the training centers in Lucknow, Agra, Mawana in district Meerut and Sakaldiha in district Chandauli established by the Government for imparting training for teaching Urdu or any other training qualification recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto.
(ii) Basic Teacher's Certificate from any of the training centers in Lucknow, Agra, Mawana in district Meerut and Sakaldiha in district Chandauli established by the Government for imparting training for teaching Urdu or any other training qualification recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto or Basic Teacher's Certificate (BTC) (Urdu) and have passed teacher eligibility test conducted by the Government of Uttar Pradesh.

5. The essential qualifications of candidates having proficiency in Urdu for appointment to the posts referred to in sub-clause (ii) of clause (a) of Rule 5 for teaching in Urdu medium shall be as follows:
5. The essential qualifications of candidates having proficiency in Urdu for appointment to the posts referred to in sub-clause (ii) of clause (a) of Rule 5 for teaching in Urdu medium shall be as follows:
(i) A Bachelor's Degree from a University established by law in India or a Degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto. The qualifications for proficiency in Urdu will be such as may be prescribed from time to time by the Government.
(i) A Bachelor's Degree from a University established by law in India or a Degree recognized by the Government as equivalent thereto. The qualifications for proficiency in Urdu will be such as may be prescribed from time to time by the Government.
(ii) Training qualifications of two years B.T.C. Urdu special training course.
(ii) Training qualification of two years B.T.C. Urdu special training course and have passed teacher eligibility test conducted by Government of Uttar Pradesh



In respect of grant of compassionate appointment under 1981 Rules, there is no specific provision. Rule 10 of the 1981 Rules talks of relaxation and the State Government in its turn has issued Government Order on 04.09.2000 dealing with the grant of compassionate appointment. Relevant extract of the said Government Order is being quoted below:

On the parameters of the provisions quoted and discussed above, the case in hand is being looked into. Each one of the petitioners, claims to have been appointed in consonance with the Government Order dated 04.09.2000. In the said Government Order a specific provision has been provided therein that all those incumbents who fulfill the requisite educational qualification, but do not have training qualification, they can move application for grant of compassionate appointment and the said incumbent would be offered appointment and shall be sent for training of B.T.C. course in the respective District Institutes of Education and Training, and after they successfully complete the training, they would be offered appointment on regular basis. However, in case an incumbent fails to pass the aforesaid examination, his candidature would automatically stand cancelled and he would be offered appointment on class IV post and his claim may also be considered for appointment against class III post as per the exigency.

The moot question before this Court is that when the provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 have been enforced and necessary eligibility criteria has been fixed for being appointed as a teacher in the institutions defined under Section 2 (n) of the said Act, then as to whether appointment of an untrained person as teacher is feasible or not? by invoking the provisions of relaxation in the matter of compassionate appointment.
The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 has been enforced with effect from 27th August 2009 in the belief that the value of equality, social justice, democracy and creation of just a humane society can be achieved only through the elementary education to all. The provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 also aims at including the children from disadvantaged group and weaker sections to get education, in consonance with the provisions of Article 21A of the Constitution. Apart from dealing with the right of children to free and compulsory education and making of special provision in the said direction, the Parliament has taken care of the fact that the teachers who are there to impart education, they should have also certain qualification for being appointed, and in view of this clear cut mandate has been made under Sub-section (1) of Section 23 of the said Act, that person possessing such minimum qualification as laid down by the academic authority authorized by the Central Government by notification, shall be eligible for being appointed as teacher. Sub-section (2) of Section 23 of 2009 Act gives liberty to the State Government to collect data of the adequacy of the institutions offering courses of training education, and in case teachers possessing minimum qualifications are not available in sufficient number, requesting Central Government to relax the minimum qualification required for appointment as a teacher, for such period not exceeding five years, as may be specified in the notification. A proviso has also been added providing that a teacher who at the commencement of this Act, does not possess minimum qualification as laid down under sub-section (1), shall acquire such minimum qualification within a period of five years. Apex Court in the case of State of U.P. vs. Bhupendra Nath Tripathi, 2010 (3) SCC 238, apart from holding that State can fix higher qualification, has taken the view that proper training of teacher is integral aspect in effectuation of right of education. Right conferred under Article 21A of the Constitution would remain illusory in the absence of State taking adequate steps to have required number of schools manned by efficient and qualified teachers. Precise mention has been made that before teachers are allowed to teach the children, they are required to receive appropriate and adequate training from duly recognized training institute.
The authority to fix minimum qualification has been out sourced by the Central Government and the NCTE has been declared as authorized academic authority to lay down minimum qualification for a person to be eligible for being appointed as teacher. The N.C.T.E. in its turn has proceeded to notify the educational qualification on 05.04.2010 as is required by Section 23 (2) of the 2009 Act and different sets of minimum qualifications have been provided for teachers for class I to V and class VI to class VIII with requirement to pass T.E.T. to be conducted by the appropriate Government in accordance with the guidelines framed for the purpose. The T.E.T. as such has to be conducted by the State Government. For the purpose of implementation of 2009 Act Rules have also been framed known as U.P. Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2011 and the said Rules have been enforced with effect from 27th July, 2011. Said Rules have been framed in supercession of all existing rules and orders on the subject,

and Rule 15 is clear that minimum educational qualification for teachers laid down by an authority authorized by the Central Government shall be applicable for all schools referred to in clause (n) of Section 2. 
The State Government in its turn on 07.09.2011 proceeded to authorize the Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad to hold the T.E.T., and accordingly guidelines had also been issued to be complied with for passing T.E.T. (Teacher Eligibility Test) 


Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1981934

UPTET/ Allahabad Highcourt : Recruitment Advertisement of More than 72000 Teachers will come by 7th December 2012



UPTET/ Allahabad Highcourt  : Recruitment Advertisement of More than 72000 Teachers will come by 7th December 2012

See Highcourt Judgement -

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 38

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39674 of 2012

Petitioner :- Akhilesh Tripathi & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav

Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
An affidavit has been filed by the Secretary, Basic Education Board U.P., Allahabad. Along with affidavit he has enclosed an order of the Central Government dated 10th September, 2012, whereby relaxation in respect of minimum qualification to be possessed by a teacher to be appointed in recognized institutions under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, which will includes the institutions run by the Basic Shiksha Parishad also, has been provided. Such relaxation has been directed to be applicable till 31st March, 2014
With reference to Rule 15 of the U.P. Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2011 it is contended that no further amendment in the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as Rules, 1981) is required and State is now under legal obligation to ensure that requisite number of qualified teachers are appointed in the Parishadiya Vidyalayas so as to make the right of children to free and compulsory education meaningful. Apex Court has held that under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 it is but necessary that requisite number of qualified teachers are appointed in the institutions covered by the Act. 
Since there are more than 72,000 existing vacancies in Parishadiya Vidyalayas throughout the State, it is necessary for the State to ensure that advertisements are published and qualified teachers are appointed. Every days delay in appointment of qualified teachers only adversely reflect upon the education in the institutions
The issue, as to whether any amendment in Rules, 1981 is required after such relaxation or not, may be examined by the Secretary, Basic Shiksha, U.P. Government, Lucknow at the first instance, and, in case such amendment is necessary, appropriate notification may be issued without any further delay. In any case the State Government must come out with an appropriate advertisement inviting applications for appointment of qualified teachers in accordance with the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act and the Rules framed by the State of U.P. read with Rules, 1981 on or before 07th December, 2012. 
Any advertisement so published shall not prejudice the right of the petitioners in the present petition
List on 07th December, 2012. 
Order Date :- 6.11.2012
Pkb/


Source : http://elegalix2.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2198290
*******************************
About this line  -
Such relaxation has been directed to be applicable till 31st March, 2014.

WHAT I feel is - it can relaxation for B. Ed candidates for recruitment as Primary Teachers as it is damanded from Central Govt. / NCTE for RTE implementation.
-----------------
About this para -
no further amendment in the U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as Rules, 1981) is required and State is now under legal obligation to ensure that requisite number of qualified teachers are appointed in the Parishadiya Vidyalayas so as to make the right of children to free and compulsory education meaningful

I feel it can be general terms and conditions related to qualification/  selection system and other aspects of advertisement.
---------------------------
About this para -
the issue, as to whether any amendment in Rules, 1981 is required after such relaxation or not, may be examined by the Secretary, Basic Shiksha, U.P. Government, Lucknow at the first instance, and, in case such amendment is necessary, appropriate notification may be issued without any further delay.

I feel relaxation - which can be B. Ed candidates eligibility for Primary Teachers (I am not 100% sure, but most likely it is ) at this time  after relaxation till 2014, And when such relaxation comes then it can be amended in Rules,1981
--------------------------
I don't know exact details and better explanations are invited from viewers.
Some people are saying amendment can be change of base of selection. But here point is relaxation, And I don't change of base can be treated as relaxation.

Whatever I think , Which can be possible with respect to advt. I tried to explain.
And I am not an expert. For better explanation / details , Only concerned authority can guide/ explain you.